In our last commentary, we noted the rebound in economic output was giving investors hope and largely accounted for the rally in stocks off the March low.  We also wrote of the risk of a resurgence of the virus which is now happening in a handful of states.  The flare-ups bear watching, but the original lockdowns were never going to eradicate the virus short of unacceptable economic pain.  More spread was inevitable once states started to relax their lockdowns.  But the health, social, and economic costs of shutting down the economy again are too high. Twenty-one million Americans are unemployed.  Many businesses and livelihoods have been destroyed.  Rhode Island recently reported a 22% spike in drug overdose deaths in the first three months of the year.

As some governors have started to reduce permitted activity, we are starting to see a decline in hours worked at small businesses relative to recent trends.  For the U.S. as a whole, the same trend is less pronounced but does appear to be starting.  Massive monetary and fiscal stimulus created potential for a strong rebound in activity, but as long as the virus remains a threat, activity can’t recover fully.  It will be a long haul, but Americans have managed through worse.

Bulls point to an accommodative Fed as one of the key factors in their favor.  So it makes sense to know what FOMC members have been saying in recent weeks.  First, economic activity has started to bottom.  Second, economic weakness will likely persist for a long period of time.  Weak labor markets and low inflation are far more likely than high inflation that requires policy tightening.  Third, the FOMC is arguing for more fiscal and monetary policy easing.  In our view, the Fed is not likely to tighten until labor markets are showing real strength.  We don’t expect a rate hike before 2023.

THE DOMINANCE OF GROWTH STOCKS LIKELY TO CONTINUE

The influence of value traders seems to have diminished since the bear market of 2007-2009.  Since then, growth stocks have trounced value stocks in cumulative performance.  Growth stocks typically have a ‘story’ and grow at higher rates in sales and earnings.  Hence, investors pay higher P/E multiples (and other metrics) for the luxury of higher growth.  Value stocks are cheaper based on traditional metrics (lower price/earnings, price/cash flow, low price/sales, price/book, etc.).  Very often value stocks are cyclical, and investors value cyclical stocks less because their results are more volatile.  We expect growth stocks to continue to outperform value for the foreseeable future for three primary reasons:
 
First, technology companies (considered growth) are now a much larger share of the global economy which explains why tech is the largest component of the S&P 500 index as shown in the pie chart below.  As a result, more dollars from index funds will flow into tech than other sectors pushing prices higher.

 

The five largest companies in America are all in the tech sector which tends to have higher valuations and higher growth.  For example, the FAANG stocks (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google) all exhibit excellent growth in their respective businesses.  Remember, investors always go where the growth is.
 
Second, Warren Buffet’s success has created a lot of professional copycats (Mr. Buffet is known primarily as a value investor, although he has become more ‘growthy’ in the last decade).  Because of all these Warren wanna-be’s, looking for attractive value stocks is like looking for bargains along with thousands of expert buyers.  No wonder Buffet is sitting on over $100 billion in cash still looking for a home.
 
Third, loose Fed policy (among many other factors) has pushed stock valuations higher across the board.  For these higher valuations, investors would rather buy growth than ‘cheap’ assets because they are not cheap anymore.  Many quality value stocks today trade at 14-15x forward earnings compared to 7-9x when stocks overall are cheap.  So today’s value stocks are hardly a compelling value. 
 
So, should investors shun value stocks completely?  No, not at all, primarily because value/growth cycles are unpredictable.  Value stocks will have their day in the sun, especially if growth stock valuations become silly.  And if we are near the beginning of a new economic cycle (and a new bull market), value stocks tend to do well in a ‘green shoots’ environment.  We will focus on growth for now, overweighting technology and consumer discretionary stocks.  We also like health care stocks which tend to be a nice blend of growth and value.

Knowledge – Results

Experts in Risk Management

Are you prepared for the next market correction or financial crisis?

Knowledge – Results

Experts in Risk Management

Are you prepared for the next market correction or financial crisis?

Knowledge – Results

Experts in Risk Management

Are you prepared for the next market correction or financial crisis?

Knowledge – Results

Experts in Risk Management

Are you prepared for the next market correction or financial crisis?

Real Retirement Solutions

designed to improve
  • Wealth Preservation
  • Management of Risky Assets
  • Peace of Mind

This is achieved through an ongoing assessment of market risks given your specific financial situation and goals.

Get Started

Professional Expertise

Leadership Team

Richard Furmanski

Richard Furmanski

CFA

has been a portfolio manager and analyst for over 35 years. He manages conservative, tax-efficient portfolios for both pre-retirees and retirees. His lower risk approach appeals to investors who want less volatility and competitive risk-adjusted returns.

View full bio

Mary Ellen Adam

Mary Ellen Adam

Director of Operations

has been in office administration for over twenty years. Her experience includes customer service, firm operations, and office administration. She interacts with our clients on a day-to-day basis and handles any requests that may arise.

View full bio

Frequently Asked Questions

If you can't find the answer to your questions here, feel free to give us a call at 847-847-2505

Do you manage both stock and bond portfolios?

Yes. We build a portfolio of conservative, high-quality stocks and hold them for the long-term. The average holding period is 4 – 5 years. Our focus is on stocks that are suitable for retirement portfolios.

Our high-quality bond portfolios are designed to provide both income and stability of principal. Bonds provide the anchor for balanced accounts (those holding both stocks and bonds).

What is your investment philosophy?
We take great care in purchasing only high-quality stocks and bonds intent on a multi-year holding period. Portfolio turnover and taxable realized gains are modest in comparison to other active managers. We do not time the market but will become more defensive, in terms of stock holdings, when market conditions warrant.
Will the portfolio be managed in accordance with my financial goals?
Yes. Each of our clients has a custom-tailored portfolio. These custom portfolios are designed to meet specific client objectives with a thoughtful approach to specific constraints such as risk tolerance. And as each client’s situation changes, the portfolio does as well. There is no cookie cutter approach.
What kind of expertise do you have and how can that help me in difficult markets?
We have been working with high-net-worth clients like you since 1982. Over that time we have helped them to navigate several bear markets and financial crises (including the stock market crash of 1987). We hold the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and Certified Financial Planner (CFP) designations.
Are you sensitive to taxes when managing portfolios?
Yes. Our holding period for an individual stock averages 4 plus years which means our turnover is low and realized gains can be carefully managed. Further, where possible, we tax loss harvest small losses as a way of offsetting gains taken elsewhere in the portfolio.
How have you performed?
Results will differ by client and the level of customization but we have provided competitive investment returns for many years.
How do you charge for your services?
We charge a management or consultant fee based upon the size and level of customization of the account. As the account grows, we benefit together.

Recent Commentaries

Stay up to date with all of our latest comments and analysis.

January 2025 Market Commentary

The S&P 500 has had a 20%+ return for two years in a row. It has only rallied 20%+ in back-to-back years three...

November 2024 Market Commentary

With an YTD gain of 22.1% through yesterday, the S&P 500 is on pace for its second annual 20% gain in a row. Surprisingly, that has only happened two other times:  first, three times in a row from 1954-56, and second, four years in a row from 1995-98.  However,...

October 2024 Market Commentary

China may be our biggest adversary, but the health of their economy and markets are important to the U.S. They are a major trading partner and their markets contribute to overall global stability. Chinese policymakers are finally alarmed enough to shift out of low...

September 2024 Market Commentary

August was a roller coaster for stocks. Moves lower in a roller coaster market can be terrifying, and in the first three trading days of August, investors had to contend with economic data showing what looked like a sharply decelerating economy and the unwind of the...

Monthly Updates

November 2024 Mid-Month Recap

As we mentioned in previous commentaries, Barron’s Big Money Poll represents the thoughts of large U.S. investment advisors. Their opinions and forecasts are what is discounted in stock and bond prices.  We think that is important. The recent fall edition of the Poll...

October 2024 Mid-Month Recap

INVESTORS BALANCE SHEET – PROS AND CONS Here are a few of the pros and cons investors should consider when forming an opinion of the stock market.  It is always important for investors to look at both sides of the argument even if they feel strongly in one direction,...

As a current or near term retiree you have real concerns…

We provide dedicated solutions
Contact Us